Kim's twitter Feud

Another star bites back on twitter. We hear about ofeten that people jump on all kinds of social sites and jumps freely expresses their opinion on different stars pages. Kim Kardashin although many feel it's well deserved have been no stranger telling her off through the social media. here recently after she posted about taking her daughter swimming for the first time and was attacked by another twitter. Yahoo says "
"We took our baby girl swimming today for the 1st time, she loved it so much! #BestDayEver," the 33-year-old wrote. Shortly after posting the message, a commenter apparently replied that it was nice that the baby girl "got to see her parents for a change!"

PHOTOS: Kim's post-baby body

That snarky quip elicited a quick response from Kardashian. "[You] sound so ignorant. Bc I don't tweet or instagram my every move w my daughter means I am not with her 247? We share what we want," the first-time mom wrote. "Or is it bc I go support my fiancé at every show & I pos.t pix? When the baby goes down 4 bed or a nap, parents are allowed 2 work & support each other."

I am so for kim Responding back. I think people are toooooo comfortable behind the screens and say anything that comes to their minds. I think people should remember the saying "if you don't have anything nice to say then don't say anything at all." Also I agree with kim because we cant assume that we know a star based on the information that makes it to the news.

How about you? do you think it's ok to attack stars through social media? Is it what they signed up for as a celebrity or do posters take it too far?

full link here:
 http://omg.yahoo.com/news/kim-kardashian-takes-north-swimming-first-time-defends-231500635-us-weekly.html

Humblebrag? Bragging on Twiter tisk tisk or is it ?

Humble bragging?  according  to abc news " Josh Romney, Mitt Romney's son, is drawing some flak after rescuing four people from a car crash on Thanksgiving. It wasn't the act itself that sparked the ire of so many on social media, but rather the tweet he posted in the aftermath of his self-acknowledged heroism.
Romney tweeted a photo of himself standing next to the overturned SUV, writing:
"Was first on scene to big accident, see pic of car in the house. I lifted 4 people out to safety. All ok. Thankful." @joshromney
The photo and caption of the offending tweet quickly drew accusations of "humble bragging," considered by some an even worse offense than overt bragging. Why? Because the humble brag is not only doused with an obvious shot at phony modesty, but it also cheekily seeks the sympathy of an audience supposedly incognizant of what the braggart is trying to get away with."
I don't  find it offensive or out right wrong because people are known to over tweet things in their lives. Therefore, I'm not shocked he tweeted it. However, I don't think I would post my good deeds online only because I just feel like that it is something that should be kept between God and yourself. One thing I hate the most are like my picture of tweet because ABC. However, with that said I don't think the he is a bad person because of it. Honestly, I rolled my eyes as I rolled as I read the story and it start talking about people complaining.

How do you feel about him showing the picture and post on Twitter? Is it shameful or no big deal?
Below is the picture that got him in trouble and the link to the whole story?
http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/josh-romney-draws-fire-crash-heroism-humblebrag-025554396--abc-news-celebrities.html

Obama's Heckler

Chinese Illegal immigrant Ju Hung interrupted Obama's speech and  basically demanded Obama to make a changes so that he's family can be together. Ii think that one no matter your objective that it's rude to heckler anyone. I can honestly say no matter the president current or past that is still living I would love to in in the audience of any of their speeches. to this day I would love to take pictures and shake hands with the Any of the Bush's or Obama. I understand that  this guy in particular was not trying to be disrespectful but he was. In the comments I noticed a lot of people felt like as an ILLEGAL and I REPEAT ILLEGAL immigrant that he has no room to demand anything and that his family should come over here the "right" way. So how do you feel on the subject of ILLEGAL immigrants coming over then making demands or holding rallies for change.


Here is the link below
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-heckler-ju-hong-161617642.html

shoulder to sleep on

http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/stranger-subway-sleeping-new-york-202320942.html

 

It's nice to see a nice video going viral. This is weeks old but it did not post. However, as Thanksgiving is approaching it's the time to be Thankful and kind to one another. will you lend your shoulder for a total stranger? Honestly, I think Ill ask them do they want to lean of the wall if we are sitting on a seat that has a window close. It will be hard for me to allow anyone let alone a stranger just sleep on me. I thought I'LL share this because it all started with a Jewish man allowing a young black boy sleep on him. This kind out is how we all should be including myself. 

 

 

Jesus and a Marathon

http://news.yahoo.com/nyc-marathon-jesus-200033428.html

Jesus takes Twitter by storm. Many stories go viral but just a simple picture. A man takes was pictured running the NYC Marathon barefoot and dressed like JESUS. That's right running a marathon as Jesus. It's very interesting and makes you wonder why is he doing so. Is it for likes  on Facebook or for the sake of going viral. In the link above it talks about how many people have tweeted, facebooked, or placed the picture on instagram. No one yet knows why he did at least I can found out why. However, I am sure was done for likes or at least to get us talking and we are talking. So I guess job well done sir.

Do you think this was done for likes and what do you think about people doing similar stunts has he done? Fun and refreshing or a little crazy ?

Glitches in the healthcare system??

Just curious sense you do hear about the glitches in the system. The GOP is using the glitch in the healthcare page as a reason for to push their agenda to delay the plan into taking action. Some democrats are actually now saying that maybe we should consider a delay or at least consider giving extensions to give people more time to get insurance. I feel like even IF there is not a delay there should be an extension.

Below are several takes either democrats or Republicans making their claims.

http://news.yahoo.com/heres-tax-increase-republican-lawmakers-support-083408479.html

http://theplazz.com/2013/10/1302568/

http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/manchins-obamacare-mandate-delay-could-create-political-peril/


How do feel about the glitches. I just heard as I type this that there are still problems. Now the Republican law makers want to make Obama's administration to release the number of people who have successfully signed up for the new plans. Should there be a delay or should something like  this be suspected.

Do facebook = increased divorces

Funny thing I was listening to the James fortune's radio show on mypraise 102.5 Atlanta's inspirational station. (best station if you like gospel music by the way). He has a segment called what will you do if this happens to you. Well the topic yesterday was based on an article that stated that 1/3 of divorces have been linked to facebook. I thought that was very interested so I went to search to see if I could find the article. honestly I am not sure if he quoted the site or I just forgot so I am not sure if this is the same one or not. However, I did find one that stated that said that  "33 per cent of the 5,000 behaviour-based divorce petitions filed with the firm in the past year mentioned the site." Here is the full link here of the story here.


http://www.rediff.com/news/report/facebook-the-reason-for-rising-divorce-rates/20111231.htm

So this link only talks about only facebook. So it makes me curious on how many other social media sites have been linked in divorce papers. Do you think that there was problems already in paradise or is it true that these different mass media outlets are making it easier to cheat?

My personal opinion is that it may be true that social media may allow you to link to old class mates or even other people. However, I don't think it makes a person to cheat. I think it's up to the individual to be able to connect with people from their past without cheating on your spouse or even your significant  other. I think if you think it's too hard then maybe you should not get on social networks or not add your ex's or people you think you are attracted to. It's kind of crazy but I love judge Judy and she has been a judge for many years and she has claimed it's crazy on how many people now uses social networks as their evidence. I think that will grow because so many people are so careless on what they put online. I think they forget that once it's online it pretty much out there for ever. Especially with features like snapshot, even you have strict privacy setting people can take a picture of the context on their screen without you ever knowing. so there is no point of deleting anything.

what is your opinion on the increase of social networks being cited in the divorce papers ? do you think it will continue to increase? and also do you think we can blame the networks or was the relationship already in trouble? feel free to answer any of the questions or all if you want to.