Kim's twitter Feud

Another star bites back on twitter. We hear about ofeten that people jump on all kinds of social sites and jumps freely expresses their opinion on different stars pages. Kim Kardashin although many feel it's well deserved have been no stranger telling her off through the social media. here recently after she posted about taking her daughter swimming for the first time and was attacked by another twitter. Yahoo says "
"We took our baby girl swimming today for the 1st time, she loved it so much! #BestDayEver," the 33-year-old wrote. Shortly after posting the message, a commenter apparently replied that it was nice that the baby girl "got to see her parents for a change!"

PHOTOS: Kim's post-baby body

That snarky quip elicited a quick response from Kardashian. "[You] sound so ignorant. Bc I don't tweet or instagram my every move w my daughter means I am not with her 247? We share what we want," the first-time mom wrote. "Or is it bc I go support my fiancé at every show & I pos.t pix? When the baby goes down 4 bed or a nap, parents are allowed 2 work & support each other."

I am so for kim Responding back. I think people are toooooo comfortable behind the screens and say anything that comes to their minds. I think people should remember the saying "if you don't have anything nice to say then don't say anything at all." Also I agree with kim because we cant assume that we know a star based on the information that makes it to the news.

How about you? do you think it's ok to attack stars through social media? Is it what they signed up for as a celebrity or do posters take it too far?

full link here:
 http://omg.yahoo.com/news/kim-kardashian-takes-north-swimming-first-time-defends-231500635-us-weekly.html

Humblebrag? Bragging on Twiter tisk tisk or is it ?

Humble bragging?  according  to abc news " Josh Romney, Mitt Romney's son, is drawing some flak after rescuing four people from a car crash on Thanksgiving. It wasn't the act itself that sparked the ire of so many on social media, but rather the tweet he posted in the aftermath of his self-acknowledged heroism.
Romney tweeted a photo of himself standing next to the overturned SUV, writing:
"Was first on scene to big accident, see pic of car in the house. I lifted 4 people out to safety. All ok. Thankful." @joshromney
The photo and caption of the offending tweet quickly drew accusations of "humble bragging," considered by some an even worse offense than overt bragging. Why? Because the humble brag is not only doused with an obvious shot at phony modesty, but it also cheekily seeks the sympathy of an audience supposedly incognizant of what the braggart is trying to get away with."
I don't  find it offensive or out right wrong because people are known to over tweet things in their lives. Therefore, I'm not shocked he tweeted it. However, I don't think I would post my good deeds online only because I just feel like that it is something that should be kept between God and yourself. One thing I hate the most are like my picture of tweet because ABC. However, with that said I don't think the he is a bad person because of it. Honestly, I rolled my eyes as I rolled as I read the story and it start talking about people complaining.

How do you feel about him showing the picture and post on Twitter? Is it shameful or no big deal?
Below is the picture that got him in trouble and the link to the whole story?
http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/josh-romney-draws-fire-crash-heroism-humblebrag-025554396--abc-news-celebrities.html

Obama's Heckler

Chinese Illegal immigrant Ju Hung interrupted Obama's speech and  basically demanded Obama to make a changes so that he's family can be together. Ii think that one no matter your objective that it's rude to heckler anyone. I can honestly say no matter the president current or past that is still living I would love to in in the audience of any of their speeches. to this day I would love to take pictures and shake hands with the Any of the Bush's or Obama. I understand that  this guy in particular was not trying to be disrespectful but he was. In the comments I noticed a lot of people felt like as an ILLEGAL and I REPEAT ILLEGAL immigrant that he has no room to demand anything and that his family should come over here the "right" way. So how do you feel on the subject of ILLEGAL immigrants coming over then making demands or holding rallies for change.


Here is the link below
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-heckler-ju-hong-161617642.html

shoulder to sleep on

http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/stranger-subway-sleeping-new-york-202320942.html

 

It's nice to see a nice video going viral. This is weeks old but it did not post. However, as Thanksgiving is approaching it's the time to be Thankful and kind to one another. will you lend your shoulder for a total stranger? Honestly, I think Ill ask them do they want to lean of the wall if we are sitting on a seat that has a window close. It will be hard for me to allow anyone let alone a stranger just sleep on me. I thought I'LL share this because it all started with a Jewish man allowing a young black boy sleep on him. This kind out is how we all should be including myself. 

 

 

Jesus and a Marathon

http://news.yahoo.com/nyc-marathon-jesus-200033428.html

Jesus takes Twitter by storm. Many stories go viral but just a simple picture. A man takes was pictured running the NYC Marathon barefoot and dressed like JESUS. That's right running a marathon as Jesus. It's very interesting and makes you wonder why is he doing so. Is it for likes  on Facebook or for the sake of going viral. In the link above it talks about how many people have tweeted, facebooked, or placed the picture on instagram. No one yet knows why he did at least I can found out why. However, I am sure was done for likes or at least to get us talking and we are talking. So I guess job well done sir.

Do you think this was done for likes and what do you think about people doing similar stunts has he done? Fun and refreshing or a little crazy ?

Glitches in the healthcare system??

Just curious sense you do hear about the glitches in the system. The GOP is using the glitch in the healthcare page as a reason for to push their agenda to delay the plan into taking action. Some democrats are actually now saying that maybe we should consider a delay or at least consider giving extensions to give people more time to get insurance. I feel like even IF there is not a delay there should be an extension.

Below are several takes either democrats or Republicans making their claims.

http://news.yahoo.com/heres-tax-increase-republican-lawmakers-support-083408479.html

http://theplazz.com/2013/10/1302568/

http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/manchins-obamacare-mandate-delay-could-create-political-peril/


How do feel about the glitches. I just heard as I type this that there are still problems. Now the Republican law makers want to make Obama's administration to release the number of people who have successfully signed up for the new plans. Should there be a delay or should something like  this be suspected.

Do facebook = increased divorces

Funny thing I was listening to the James fortune's radio show on mypraise 102.5 Atlanta's inspirational station. (best station if you like gospel music by the way). He has a segment called what will you do if this happens to you. Well the topic yesterday was based on an article that stated that 1/3 of divorces have been linked to facebook. I thought that was very interested so I went to search to see if I could find the article. honestly I am not sure if he quoted the site or I just forgot so I am not sure if this is the same one or not. However, I did find one that stated that said that  "33 per cent of the 5,000 behaviour-based divorce petitions filed with the firm in the past year mentioned the site." Here is the full link here of the story here.


http://www.rediff.com/news/report/facebook-the-reason-for-rising-divorce-rates/20111231.htm

So this link only talks about only facebook. So it makes me curious on how many other social media sites have been linked in divorce papers. Do you think that there was problems already in paradise or is it true that these different mass media outlets are making it easier to cheat?

My personal opinion is that it may be true that social media may allow you to link to old class mates or even other people. However, I don't think it makes a person to cheat. I think it's up to the individual to be able to connect with people from their past without cheating on your spouse or even your significant  other. I think if you think it's too hard then maybe you should not get on social networks or not add your ex's or people you think you are attracted to. It's kind of crazy but I love judge Judy and she has been a judge for many years and she has claimed it's crazy on how many people now uses social networks as their evidence. I think that will grow because so many people are so careless on what they put online. I think they forget that once it's online it pretty much out there for ever. Especially with features like snapshot, even you have strict privacy setting people can take a picture of the context on their screen without you ever knowing. so there is no point of deleting anything.

what is your opinion on the increase of social networks being cited in the divorce papers ? do you think it will continue to increase? and also do you think we can blame the networks or was the relationship already in trouble? feel free to answer any of the questions or all if you want to.

devion effect??/

Ok here's a sad but nice story that has gone viral. A little boy by the name of Devion who wants to be adopted. He has been in the foster system almost all his life and recently wanted to get out more than before. After learning that he biological mother has passed away he asked his adoptive counselor to dress him up so he could get in front of a church to ask for somebody to adopt him. he just wants love in fact he claims that he will take anyone a mom, dad, black, white, or purple it does not matter to him.

here is a link to his story

http://www.webpronews.com/boys-adoption-plea-ill-take-anyone-2013-10


It has been successful according to them on the view they have stated he has received over 10,000 responses. I hope he gets his wish soon. Is it ok to use the media to get attention like this. Or just what you think about the story.

Shut down

This shut down is crazy if you ask me. I think they are being a bunch of babies and we are going to feel the end effect of all this. Reason that I am so against it is. One the Republicans claim its to show that they are so against the affordable health care act or better known as “Obama care”. Well guess what is up in running Obama care and what’s not operating the government. Secondly, ironically it’s costing us money every day that the government is shut down. So we closed and literally losing money. I feel that they don’t give rats behind about the smaller individuals that they are hurting by being shut down. So what they are willing to “hold” their check until it’s over. That doesn’t impress me why because they will still get paid while some government officials will not get a check unless they file for unemployment which takes a while and on top of that will not be the same amount that they lost.
  Here are link to who are affected by shut down
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/29/us-government-shutdown-services-affected
obama blames republicans (video)
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/05/politics/obama-interview/index.html
Bohener Blames Democrats
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/04/politics/government-shutdown-main/index.html

So what do you think. I think they are don't doing they jobs and instead of the the other government officals that are losing money. I think they should becasue they are responsible of balancing a budget no matter what. so wha's yur take on the matter. Do you agree with the the stance each side has taken?

Navy yard shooter video Released

So like many of you, I woke up to the news that there was a mass shooting at the Washington navy yard last week. Aaron Alexis was a government contractor who killed 12 people. According to new details he believed that he was controlled by low- frequency radio waves. Now my issue with this is that they released the video. Yes, I am as noisy as can be and like getting some insider video. However, I don’t think this video should have been released. I understand that they believe it could help the public but I don’t see it. In my humble opinion I think the government and other outlets have crossed the line by releasing the video. I understand that they didn’t release people actually getting shot but this VIDEO SHOULD HAVE STAYED PRIVATE. I think for one it may have been too soon for the deceased family and also I just think it’s showing this crazy man pouncing around before he went on his killing spree taking 12 innocent people’s lives. I don’t think there is anything positive or lessons that could be learned from the video. So what do you think? Do we need to see this video or should they have kept the video private.


Below is a link were you can check out the video; That has been released. I Don't ;like it being out here but now it doesn't matter because it's everywhere. so here you go so you can have a clear opinion

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/09/25/fbi-releases-grim-video-details-of-aaron-alexis-navy-yard-shooting?s_cid=rss:fbi-releases-grim-video-details-of-aaron-alexis-navy-yard-shooting

Here is a link to the original story
 http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/dc-navy-yard-gunshots/index.html

United States to the RESCUE Again????

Go to Syria Or Not to Go? That is the question. I was going to avoid Syria but It's HOT right now so I thought I would briefly talk about it and offer all of you a chance to give me your opinion on the topic. First, I'd like to be clear that I am not an expert on the topic by no means and as matter of fact I normally stay away from these type of topics because I am weak in these areas. However, right now it's HOT and I have an Opinion and want to get more opinions on the subject. So please be free in the end to leave a comment and tell your opinion on Syria? Ok In simple terms.. no matter where you turn you here that President Obama and officials in the white house state that they have proof that Syria is evil . They have made claims that they used deadly gases on their own people..  President Obama has said that this move violates treaties and requires action. I don't think the debate is whether or not they indeed did anything wrong, but simply should the United States get involved ?  Is it necessary? will it prove anything? can it be done as effectively and quick as Obama says? These are the many questions people from both sides are asking. below I find links from people for and against the idea.

President on why we should Go..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxu0j4KD2EU

Some of both sides say they will vote No.. Here is why some Key GOP say they will vote NO..
http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-gop-senators-syria-20130901,0,2785978.story



John Boehner on board with plans to attack Syria
http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/politics/article/Boehner-s-aboard-Obama-gains-Syria-strike-support-4782118.php


Here's my take on the matter. I personally don't see why we should get involved in this issue. I do agree with others who believe this is not our battle to fight and will only make matters worse. I think for one we have no personal gain what so ever and I don't think  not doing anything will affect us in a negative way. If  I am wrong please tell me how and why. I think this time we, The United States, simply need to sit this one out. So what do you think? Please keep all comments friendly to everyone including the president. I believe even if you hate his way of running the country and disagree with his policies he is still the president.
**** I wanted to post this before he did his address and plea to congress about holding out on the vote. So now we are waiting on Russia who plans on talking Syria out of using the deadly gases again but President Obama wants us to still be cautious and ready  to prepare to attack. My take on this is as following: well it has not changed really. I hope it works because I still feel that we should not get involved. Now again, I open it up to discussion because I am not an expert.

Intoduction

My theme for my blog is to talk about some of the hot topics that are going around the world but to try to tone it down just a little bit. I am not saying that the topics are not important but i just feel that some of the delivery of the message in order to sell the story is blown out of proportion. Like I think instead of giving the facts we are giving wayyy too much or too little information. I want to take some of the hot politic topics and try to keep it simple. so basically I want people to be serious about the topics but keep it simple. That's why I call it simplepolichick. things may change later but for the most part that will be it.. alright folks lets keep it simple.